- R wrote on 12 Nov 2007 at 23:39 +0100:
Thanks for you base64 decoder ... it definately got me out of a tight spot with
some rather important customer info...
Keep up the good work.
- Daniele wrote on 26 Oct 2007 at 10:34 +0200:
Thank you a lot for the base64enc (i notice that it's made by great Delphi). It
saves us to read corrupted mails!
Daniele
Edp
Italy
- Jonathan wrote on 10 Aug 2007 at 15:27 +0200:
thanks for the Base64 Decoder it really helped my employer read very important
e-mails
- GDR! (gdr.geekhood.net/) wrote on 13 Apr 2007 at 02:48 +0200:
Interesting site, it's always nice to read one like this. I prefer 6502, however
;)
- Jesos wrote on 30 Mar 2007 at 00:52 +0200:
Hello-
Your site is very bizarre and super. Thanks for the binbase64 utility. It's the
only one I've found that actually works.
BF sounds very intriguing. As does the 4mhz reference. I must read more on or become
a moron.
- Clive Gifford (eigenratios.blogspot.com) wrote on 16 Nov 2006 at 02:22 +0100:
Hi
Just found BFdev earlier today. I've been using it to play around with Oleg Mazonka
and Daniel Cristofano's BF self-interpreter (http://www.hevanet.com/cristofd/08.html).
I'm interested in trying to determine its "eigenratio" - see my blog for
what this is about.
Anyway, BFdev is easily the best BF IDE that I tried so far. Thanks for writing
it and making it available!
Clive Gifford
- monz (tonalsoft.com) wrote on 23 Oct 2006 at 10:32 +0200:
tim, thanks for incorporating the pbrain procedural functionality into BFdev ...
your brainfuck IDE is truly awesome, and adding the pbrain capability makes it even
better.
- tm wrote on 27 Sep 2006 at 23:51 +0200:
- Karsten wrote on 02 Aug 2006 at 20:14 +0200:
Hi Tim,
Thanks for the base64 decoder programm. Very nice and useful ! Go on
like this.... By the way I can absolutely understand your affection for
the Z80. Nowadays kids only learn to configure Windows and learn nothing
about computers. So they will end up passing puberty in discotecs rather
than in from of the computer. Poor kids. They miss something ;-)
Karsten
- Daniel wrote on 14 Apr 2006 at 23:06 +0200:
++++++++++[>+++++++>++++++++++>+++>+<<<<-]>+.>++++++++++++++.---.++++..------------------.+++++++++++++++++.++.-----------.--.>+++.